On June 15 the results of 3 independent new studies by household-name, reputable sources (inc. NASA-funded research facilities) were announced. All predicted global cooling, not global warming. (See: http://www.thenewamerican.com/tech-mainmenu-30/environment/7922-beleaguered-scientists-try-to-have-it-both-ways). The problem was the scientists were at a loss as to how to “spin” the findings in a liberal-left environment that depends on fictitious man-caused global warming dogma to sustain legislation that would spread around America’s wealth (and that of other developed countries) while still remaining eligible for funding for R&D (research and development). In most publications, therefore, the spin, has served to confuse average readers, including experts of PhD caliber in different fields) rather than help them understand the findings. But this article cuts through all the equivocating and gets it straight, including coverage of all the various “spins” out there. Many experts were interviewed to accomplish this in one brief article. Already the Left has moved to fling arrows—just see the “comments” section at the bottom of the article—even though this is a conservative-leaning publication. This gives you some idea of the stake the Left has in opposing any alternative anywhere. EVERYONE INVOLVED IN ORGANIZATIONS ON THE CLIMATE CHANGE/“GREEN” DEBATE NEEDS TO ENTER THEIR OWN COMMENTS. YOUR INPUT ON THIS IS CRITICAL, RIGHT NOW… Add Comment |
RSS Feed